From the start, the approach should have been using his own words against him.
It’s like when she claimed that 81 million people fired Trump. She certainly knows how to get under his skin.
I caught part of her economic speech, and it was brilliant as always: detailed, logical, coherent, and inspiring, especially when she highlighted our nation’s economic achievements under past presidents.
I loved when she referred to Trump as a big failure/loser, just like she did during the debate. She should incorporate that into every speech, every day, to provoke his furious Twitter rants.
In contrast, Trump just incoherently spewed his tired, old insults and grievances, claiming things like “she’s an economic wrecking ball!” and complaining about David Muir of ABC being biased during the debate.
I can’t understand how any sane, rational person could still be undecided or support him after comparing the two. It’s also baffling to see such close polls. Is the nation really this uninformed?
The entire spectacle surrounding Trump’s portrayal as a fantastic businessman is built on falsehoods designed to promote a product: “The Apprentice.”
Wow, Harris and her campaign are absolutely crushing it. The Democrats have finally figured out how to play Trump’s game without lowering themselves to his standards.